Friday, January 22, 2010

Four Thirds Lens What Are The Pros And Cons To The New Four-thirds Standards For Cameras And Lenses?

What are the pros and cons to the new four-thirds standards for cameras and lenses? - four thirds lens

Professionals are smaller, lighter and cheaper cameras. Pictures of professional quality. Lenses designed for digital photography that offers better image quality than the lens suitable films. The lenses are also among the lightest and fastest.

The disadvantages are more noise if they have ISO 1200th

The noise problem is actually a little excessive. Olympus is the leader in technology for noise reduction. It belongs to the ISO is too high, more than ever, people come over, it becomes a problem. I have pictures at night as low as ISO 800 At this level noise is a problem with a digital SLR camera. Photographs of interior spaces, even in a shop, no problem.

The 4:3-ratio actually buy as a factor in my decision, an Olympus. The same number is used and compact size, and became a standard for television and computer monitors until recently. Now we want new Olympus cameras, choose an aspect ratio of 3:2, 4:3, 1:1, 16:9, and more on the model.

The depth is not a problem, in fact, the 25mm lens that I presentedDoFs one of the available space. 3x and the crop factor, led by animal and sports photographer as an advantage.

2 comments:

rollakid said...

Strengths:
- Body-camera is small and light
- 2x crop factor means that you will be twice as more cameras, which can hold a 300mm, clear where they need to carry a heavy 600mm lens to take. (but not at the same time, the loss of a large wide-angle lens of 4 / 3 with the goal of 7 mm)
- For macro shooters, more depth of field and magnification.
.... - Overall, the Olympus is very, very strong (more than engineering)

Weaknesses:
- Small sensor, the higher pixel density, carried out the worst in low light. The picture is, according to other digital SLR camera while recording as compared with low light.
- More depth to the catching, require less depth of field (not like some portraits)

Neutral:
- Sensor size is not to their taste, if you want to go the normal ratio of 3:2 film, is not for you, because they use the 4:3 aspect ratio.
--

awesomob... said...

Strengths: small cameras, cheap lenses smaller, cheaper cameras, the cameras.

Cons: DOF and crop factor compared to the FF and 1.6 Camras cultures.

more objective selection for FF and 1.6 cameras [depends on the brand of camera]

higher image noise of the APS-C and FF cameras compared

Post a Comment